Other Articles on Church-State Union
—Beware!
|
Babylon—
Mother and Daughters
What
Are the Sins of Babylon? Part
3What happened to the Reformation?
The various reform movements, as predicted by
the prophet (Dan. 11:32-35), were "overcome by
flatteries." Each one, after accomplishing a measure of
cleansing, stopped short. So far as they found it practicable,
they imitated the example of the Church of Rome in courting and
receiving the favor of the world at the expense of their virtue
— their fidelity to Christ, the true Head of the Church.
Church and State
Church and state again made common cause. In a
measure they united their worldly interests, at the expense of the
real, the spiritual, interests of the church. Progress and reform
in the church were again at a standstill. A retrograde movement
set in. Today many of them are much farther from the proper
standard, both of faith and practice, than in the days of their
founders.
Some of the reformed churches were even
admitted to share in authority and power with earthly rulers —
for instance, the Church of England, and the Lutheran Church in
Germany. Those who have not succeeded to that extent have made
many compromising overtures to the world for smaller favors. It is
also true that while the world powers have advanced the worldly
ambitions of the unfaithful church, the church has also freely
admitted the world to her communion and fellowship. Baptized worldlings now form the large majority of her membership, filling
nearly every important position, thus dominating her.
This was the disposition which degraded the
church in the beginning of the age. This disposition brought about
the great falling away (2 Thess. 2:3,7-10), and gradually, but
rapidly, developed the Papal system.
This loose character, early assumed by the
various reform movements, and which gradually developed sectarian
organizations, continues to the present day. The more these
organizations grow in wealth, numbers and influence — the
further they fall from Christian virtue and develop the arrogance
of their mother. A few earnest Christians in the various sects
observe this to some extent, and with shame and sorrow confess and
lament it. They see that every possible effort is made by the
various sectarian organizations to please the world and to court
its favor and secure its patronage.
Elegant and costly church edifices, lofty
spires, chiming bells, grand organs, fine furnishings, artistic
choirs, polished orators, fairs, festivals, concerts, plays,
lotteries and questionable amusements and pastimes are all
arranged with a view to securing the world’s approval and
support. The grand and wholesome doctrines of Christ are thrust to
the background. False doctrines and sensational topics take their
place in the pulpit. The truth is ignored and forgotten, and the
spirit of it lost. In these particulars how truly the daughters
resemble the mother organization!
Evidences of Mother—Daughter Relationship
As one among numerous evidences of the freedom
and even pride with which this relationship of the Protestant
sects to Papacy is owned, we give the following sentiments of a
Presbyterian clergyman, quoted from one of his sermons as
published by the daily press. The gentleman said:
"Wince as you will, you must admit that
this (the Catholic Church) is the Mother Church.
She possesses an unbroken history extending back to the time of
the apostles. [Yes, that is where the apostasy began. 2 Thess.
2:7,8] For every fragment of religious truth which we
prize, we are indebted to her as the depository. If she
has no claims to being the true Church, then are we bastards
and not sons.
"Talk about missionaries to labor
amongst Romanists! I would as soon think of sending missionaries
amongst Methodists and Episcopalians and United Presbyterians
and Lutherans for the purpose of converting them into
Presbyterians."
Yes, nearly all the doctrinal errors so
tenaciously held by Protestants were brought with them from Rome,
though beyond the gross errors of Papacy, such as the sacrifice of
the mass, the worship of saints, of the virgin Mary and of images,
the auricular confession, the granting of indulgences, etc.
Considerable progress was made by each of the reform movements.
But alas! Protestants of today are not only
willing, but anxious, to make almost any compromise to secure the
favor and assistance of the old "mother" from whose
tyranny and villainy their fathers fled three centuries ago. Even
those principles of truth which at first formed the ground of
protest are being gradually forgotten or openly repudiated. The
very foundation doctrine of "justification by faith" in
the "continual sacrifice" is rapidly giving way to the
old Papal dogma of justification by works and by the sacrilegious
sacrifice of the mass. Numbers both in pulpits and in pews now
openly declare that they have no faith in the efficacy of the
precious blood of Christ as the ransom-price for sinners.
Claims of Apostolic Succession
The claims of apostolic succession and clerical
authority are almost as presumptuously set forth by some of the
Protestant clergy as by the Papal priesthood. The right of
individual private judgment — the very fundamental principle of
the protest against Papacy, which led to the Great Reformation —
is now almost as strenuously opposed by Protestants as by Papists.
Yet Protestants are fully aware that it was in the exercise of the
right of private judgment that the Reformation was begun and for a
short time carried forward. Later a presumptuous domination of
recognized leaders retarded the wheels of progress, and has, ever
since, kept them strictly within the traditional lines and put a
ban upon all who fearlessly step beyond them.
The "Protest" missing in Protestantism
Protestantism is no longer a protest against
the mother church, as at first. As a writer for the press
recently remarked — "The ism is still with
us, but what has become of the protest?"
Protestants seem to have forgotten — for they truly ignore —
the very grounds of the original protest. As systems, they are
fast drifting back toward the open arms of the "Holy (?)
Mother Church," where they are freely invited and assured of
a cordial reception.
"Let us hold out to you our hand
affectionately" (says Pope Leo to Protestants in his noted
Encyclical addressed "To The Princes and Peoples of the
Earth"), "and invite you to the unity which never
failed the Catholic church, and which never can fail. Long has
our common mother called you to her breast; long have all the
Catholics of the Universe awaited you with the anxiety of
brotherly love. ...Our heart, more even than our voice, calls to
you, dear brethren, who for three centuries past have been at
issue with us in the Christian faith."
Again, in his Encyclical to the Roman church
in America, Pope Leo says, "Our thoughts now turn to those
who dissent from us in matters of Christian faith...How
solicitous we are of their salvation; with what ardor of soul we
wish that they should be at length restored to the embrace of
the Church, the common mother of all!...Surely we ought not to
leave them to their fancies, but with mildness and charity draw
them over, using every means of persuasion to induce them to
examine closely every part of the Catholic doctrine and to free
themselves from preconceived notions."
In his "Apostolic Letter to the English
People" (1895) he gives utterance to the following prayer,
"O Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and our most gentle
Queen and Mother, look down in mercy upon England... O sorrowful
Mother, intercede for our separated brethren, that with us in
the one true fold they may be united to the Supreme Shepherd,
the Vicar of thy Son" — i.e., himself, the Pope.
In furtherance of this same plan,
"Missions for Protestants" have been started under the
charge of what are known as the "Paulist Fathers." These
meetings have been and are being held in the large cities. They
are conducted along lines of conciliation and explanation. Written
questions from Protestants are requested and answered publicly;
and tracts for Protestants are freely distributed. Protestants are
practically conceding the Romish position, and really have no
answer to make. Any one who can and does answer, and refers to
facts, is denounced as a disturber by both Protestants and
Catholics.
Every intelligent person can see how easily
Protestantism is being ensnared by this cunning craftiness, and
how perceptibly the popular current is set toward the Church of
Rome, which is changed indeed in voice and power, but unchanged in
heart. Rome is still justifying the Inquisition and other of her
methods of the dark ages by claiming her right, as
ruler of earth, to punish heretics as she pleases.
It is clear that while many faithful souls,
ignorant of the real state of the case, have reverently and
devoutly worshiped God within these Babylon systems, nevertheless,
this does not alter the fact that they are, one and all,
"harlot" systems. Confusion reigns in them
all. The name Babylon aptly fits the entire family-mother,
daughters and accomplices, the nations styled Christendom. Rev.
18:7; 17:2-6,18
In the great politico-ecclesiastical systems
which men call Christendom, but which God calls Babylon, we have
not only the foundation but also the superstructure and the
crowning pinnacle, of the present social order. This is implied in
the generally accepted term, Christendom, which of late is
applied, not only to those nations which support Christian sects
by legislation and taxation, but also to all nations which show
tolerance to Christianity without in any definite manner favoring
or supporting it.
What is the "Divine Right of Kings"?
The doctrine of "the divine right of
kings," taught or supported by almost every sect, is the
foundation of the old civil system, and had long given authority,
dignity and stability to the kingdoms of Europe. The doctrine of
the divine appointment and authority of the clergy has hindered
God’s children from progressing in divine things and bound them
by the chains of superstition and ignorance to the veneration and
adoration of fallible fellow-beings, and to their doctrines,
traditions and interpretations of God’s Word. It is this entire
order of things that is to fall and pass away in the battle of
this great day — the order of things which for centuries has
held the people docile under the ruling powers, civil, social and
religious.
All this has been by God’s permission
(not by his appointment and approval, as they claim). But though
an evil in itself, it has served a good, temporary
purpose in preventing anarchy, which is immeasurably worse. The
time for Christ’s Millennial Kingdom had not yet come. Hence God
permitted the various delusions to gain credence in order to hold
men in check until "The Time of the End."
|