Israel,
A Nation of Miracles
Whose Land?
Chapter 2
The Biblical Claim
The prophet Jeremiah 16:14-18 speaks of Israel
receiving a "double of punishment" before they are
regathered to their Land (16:14-18). This double would be a period
equal to their prior period of favor with God. Jeremiah also
observed that during this double of punishment the Land of Israel
would become relatively desolate of man and beast (33:10-16).
The Palestinian Claim
PLO Chairman Yassir Arafat in his speech before
the UN in 1974 declared, "The Jewish invasion began in 1881 . .
. Palestine was then a verdant area, inhabited mainly by an Arab
people in the course of building its life and dynamically enriching
its indigenous culture."
Financed by the oil rich Arab States, Arafat has
conducted a worldwide propaganda campaign to convince the world
community that the Holy Land has for centuries sustained a thriving
Palestinian culture.
What happens when this claim is compared with the
personal observations of the following recognized authorities? In
1738 Thomas Shaw observed a land of "barrenness . . . from want
of inhabitants." (1) In 1785 Constantine Francois de
Volney recorded the population of the three main cities. Jerusalem
had a population of 12,000 to 14,000. Bethlehem had about 600
able-bodied men. Hebron had 800 to 900 men.(2)
In 1835
Alphonse de Lamartine wrote, "Outside the city of Jerusalem, we
saw no living object, heard no living sound…a complete eternal
silence reigns in the town, in the highways, in the country…. The
tomb of a whole people."(3)
In 1857, the British consul in Palestine,
James Finn, reported, "The country is in a considerable degree
empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is that of a
body of population." This historic observation is a remarkable
confirmation of the Biblical predictions that during Israel’s
"double" period of time of punishment and dispersion, the
Lord would cause the Land to become desolate of man and beast
(Jeremiah 33:10; Zechariah 10:12; Jeremiah 16:14-18). No wonder by
1857 it was just waiting for "a body of population!"(4) In
the Lord’s providence this needed body of population-the Jewish
people-began to return after 1878 at the end of their Scriptural
period of His disfavor.
The most popular quote on the desolation of
the Land is from Mark Twain’s The Innocents Abroad (1867),
"Palestine sits in sackcloth and ashes. Over it broods the
spell of a curse that has withered its fields and fettered its
energies….Palestine is desolate and unlovely…. It is a hopeless,
dreary, heartbroken land."
The records of history confirm the Biblical
predictions that during the Jewish dispersion and "double"
of God’s disfavor, the Land of Israel would become desolate
awaiting the return of the Jewish people when its period of disfavor
ended in 1878. The records of history simply do not confirm today’s
Palestinian claim of Palestinian roots and culture in a
"verdant area" since the Arab rule of the land (A.D.
640-1099).
Southern Syria Vs. "Palestine"
The Romans had changed the name of the Land
of Israel to "Palestine." From A.D. 640 until the 1960s,
Arabs referred to this same Land as "Southern Syria."
Arabs only started calling the Land "Palestine" in the
1960s. Until about the eighteenth century, the Christian world
called this same Land, "The Holy Land." Thereafter, they
used two names: "The Holy Land" and "Palestine."
When the League of Nations in 1922 gave Great Britain the mandate to
prepare Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people, the
official name of the Land became "Palestine"—and
remained so until the rebirth of the Israeli State in 1948. During
this very period, the leaders of the Arabs in the Land, however,
called themselves Southern Syrians and clamored that the Land become
a part of a "Greater Syria." This "Arab Nation"
would include Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Transjordan as well as
Palestine. An observation in Time magazine well articulated how the
Palestinian identity was born so belatedly in the 1960s: (5)
Golda Meir once argued that there was no
such thing as a Palestinian; at the time, she wasn’t entirely
wrong. Before Arafat began his proselytizing, most of the Arabs from
the territory of Palestine thought of themselves as members of an
all-embracing Arab nation. It was Arafat who made the intellectual
leap to a definition of the Palestinians as a distinct people; he
articulated the cause, organized for it, fought for it and brought
it to the world’s attention….
If there was an Arab Palestinian culture, a
normal population increase over the centuries would have been
expected. But with the exception of a relatively few families, the
Arabs had no attachment to the Land. If Arabs from southern Syria
drifted into Palestine for economic reasons, within a generation or
so the cultural tug of Syria or other Arab lands would pull them
back. This factor is why the Arab population average remained low
until the influx of Jewish financial investments and Jewish people
in the late 1800s made the Land economically attractive. Then
sometime between 1850 and 1918, the Arab population shot up to
560,000. Not to absolve the Jews but to defend British policy, the
not overfriendly British secretary of state for the colonies Malcolm
MacDonald, declared in the House of Commons (November 24, 1938),
"The Arabs cannot say that the Jews are driving them out of the
country. If not a single Jew had come to Palestine after 1918, I
believe the Arab population of Palestine would still have been
around 600,000..."(6)
Jewish contributions and Jewish immigration
continued to flow into the Land. The Jews created industry,
agriculture, hospitals—a complete socioeconomic infrastructure. As
job opportunities increased, so did Arab immigration. In fact, in
1939 President Roosevelt observed that "Arab immigration into
Palestine since 1921 has vastly exceeded the total Jewish
immigration during this whole period." (7)
For one specific example, in 1934 between 30,000 and 36,000 Arabs
from the Hauran Province in Syria left for "the better
life" in Palestine. (8)
On the other hand, Great Britain’s White Paper
of 1939 closed the doors of Jewish immigration to their Land.
Simultaneously, there was a large-scale Arab immigration to the new
Land of opportunity during World War II. In 1946 Bartley C. Crum, a
United States Government observer, noted that tens of thousands of
Arabs had entered Palestine because of this better life–and they
were still coming.(10)
The Testimony of Arabs and Christians
Because Arabs until the 1960s spoke of Palestine
as Southern Syria or part of Greater Syria, in 1919 the General
Syrian Congress stated, "We ask that there should be no
separation of the southern part of Syria, known as Palestine."(11)
In 1939 George Antonius noted the Arab view of Palestine in 1918: (12)
Faisal’s views about the future of Palestine
did not differ from those of his father and were identical with
those held then by the great majority of politically-minded Arabs.
The representative Arab view was substantially that which King
Husain [Grand Sherif of Mecca, the great grandfather of the current
King Hussein of Jordan] had expressed to the British Government…in
January 1918. In the Arab view, Palestine was an Arab territory
forming an integral part of Syria.
Referring to the same Arab view of Palestine in
1939, George Antonius spoke of "the whole of the country of
that name [Syria] which is now split up into mandated territories..."(13)
His lament was that France's mandate over Syria did not include
Palestine which was under Britain's mandate.
As late as May 1947, Arab representatives
reminded the United Nations in a formal statement, "Palestine
is a… part of the Province of Syria…. Politically, the Arabs of
Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate
political entity."(14)
On May 31, 1956, Ahmed Shukairy had no
hesitation, as current head of the Palestine Liberation
Organization, in announcing to the Security Council the observation,
"It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern
Syria." (15)
Syrian President Hafez Assad once told PLO leader
Yassir Arafat: (16)
You do not represent Palestine as much as we do.
Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian
People, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are
an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part
of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the
true representatives of the Palestinian people.
Assad stated on March 8, 1974, "Palestine is
a principal part of Southern Syria, and we consider that it is our
right and duty to insist that it be a liberated partner of our Arab
homeland and of Syria." (17)
In the words of the late military commander
of the PLO as well as member of the PLO Executive Council, Zuhair
Muhsin: (18)
There are no differences between Jordanians,
Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation.
It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our
Palestinian identity.…yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian
identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a
Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle
against Israel [emphasis ours].
The following are significant observations by
Christians of the Arabs in Palestine in the 1800s: (19)
The Arabs themselves, who are its inhabitants,
cannot be considered but temporary residents. They pitched their
tents in its grazing fields or built their places of refuge in its
ruined cities. They created nothing in it. Since they were strangers
to the land, they never became its masters. The desert wind that
brought them hither could one day carry them away without their
leaving behind them any sign of their passage through it.
Stephen Olin, D.D., L.L.D., called one of the
most noted of American theologians-after his extensive travels in
the Middle East-wrote of the Arabs in Palestine "…with slight
exceptions they are probably all descendants of the old inhabitants
of Syria." (20)
The most authoritative Arab statement, however,
as to whom the Holy Land belongs is found in the Koran, the Islamic
Scriptures: (21)
The fact is that the Koran agrees with the Bible
that God (Allah) made a covenant with the Sons of Israel and
assigned the Holy Land to the Jews (See the Koran, Sura V, "The
Table"). The Koran also describes the land given to the Jews as
"blessed" and foresees a return of Israel to their land at
the end of days.
These testimonies confirm the Christian
Scriptures that God gave the Land to the Jewish people as an
everlasting possession. The relatively few Arabs who wandered into
the Land between A.D. 670-1878 were but temporary dwellers. The
truer perspective of history reveals that the large recent influx of
Arabs that paralleled the regathering of Jews has no historic
rootage in the Land.
The Verdict of History: Land Rights
Before Jewish immigration and Jewish investments
spawned massive Arab immigration, Arabs were actually leaving
Palestine. Then the flow of traffic reversed. "…Palestine
changed from a country of Arab emigration to one of Arab
immigration. Arabs from the Hauran in Syria as well as other
neighboring lands poured into Palestine to profit from the higher
standard of living and fresh opportunities provided by the Zionist
pioneers." (22)
This phenomenon is confirmed by the Palestine
Royal Commission Report which observed that in the period between
the Balfour Declaration and the United Nations Partition Resolution
of 1947, Palestine became a land of Arab immigration.(23) As further
documented by Ernst Frankenstein, substantial Arab immigration was a
recent phenomenon: (24)
The early "lovers of Zion" began the
stimulation of Arab immigration. Some writers have come out with the
conclusion that in 1942, 75 percent of the Arab population were
either immigrants or descendants of immigrants into Palestine during
the preceding one hundred years, mainly after 1882.
Indeed, the verdict of history does more than
confirm the Prophets that the population of the Land of Israel would
be minimal until the "double" of Israel’s disfavor ended
in 1878 when the regathering of the Jewish exiles began (Jeremiah
33:10; Zechariah 10:12 and Jeremiah 16:14-18). The record of history
testifies that the great influx of Arabs also began after that date.
These facts of history explain why the United
Nations needed to develop a definition that a "Palestinian
Refugee" is any Arab who had been in "Palestine" for
only two years. (25)
This U.N.
definition, in fact, is incompatible with the assumption that the
Arab Palestinian roots go back one or two thousand years. The Jews
themselves have dominated the Land called "Palestine" for
the past two millennia. The Jews themselves are as much
"Palestinian" as the Arabs who claim to be Palestinians.
If any population has a right to the name Palestinian (if they
wanted it), it would be the Jews whose ancestors had their Land
renamed "Palestine."
|